![]() ![]() There was nothing paranormal about it, it all can be explained rationally. ![]() Like the hole anjou, wine/dumas club storyline was just a Sherlock Holmes or Scooby-Doo level plot that was too anticlimactic in my opinion, and the whole devil mystery was just there to throw us off. like the supposed villain explaining everything, he was doing behind the curtain towards the end and then blames the reader for connecting two apparently unrelated plots. Like yeah, we do a bunch of cliches but we're self-aware of it, but it's still a cliche though. The book has a lot of these meta commentaries about the book itself and other authors in that genre. ![]() Now the first thing I must say that I enjoyed the book, I loved the characters, the setting, the atmosphere but was let down by the climax. So I was about to rewatch the movie again but saw that it was based on a book, and I thought to myself that the book might have more answers or clues about the ending. So long ago I watched the movie the ninth gate, and I like it because it was a mystery/detective that revolves around book research with an ambiguous ending that involved supernatural elements. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |